Analisis Pengaruh Sumber Daya Manusia, Infrastruktur Ekonomi Dan Social Capital Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Kabupaten Lampung Timur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis pengaruh sumber daya manusia, infrastruktur ekonomi, dan social capital terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi di Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini 2008-2017 dari 24 wilayah kecamatan di Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Metode yang digunakan menggunakan Analisis Panel Data. Hasil penelitian ini mendapati bahwa terdapat pengaruh antara jumlah usia produktif, infrastruktur jalan dan konsumsi listrik sedangkan untuk jumlah lulusan SLTA dan konsumsi air bersih penduduk tidak mempunyai pengaruh dengan pertumbuhan ekonomi di Lampung Timur. Hasil penelitian ini dapat menjadi masukan bagi Pemerintah Daerah (Pemda) untuk membantu dalam pengambilan keputusan dalam meningkatkan perekonomian masyarakat di Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Optimalisasi SDM dan usaha meningkatkan infrastuktur serta pemberdayaan social capital mampu meningkatkan pertumbuhan ekonomi daerah, sehingga akan mempengaruhi efesiensi dan kelancaran kegiatan ekonomi pada sektor lain
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".