Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leo Finkle, the protagonist in Jewish American author Bernard Malamud’s famous short story “The Magic Barrel”, is a representative embodiment of universal spiritual rebirth, especial for the Jewish people who have suffered a lot in their specific history and culture. In his writing, Astro (1977) once remarks, “Malamud often uses a prison motif to evoke any place or circumstance which restricts man’s freedom of development”. The severity of his characters’ suffering is a necessity — only great affliction can bring out their hidden spiritual force and their understanding of their own capacity for dignity and compassion. Leo Finkle, realizing his own dignity and his responsibility to others, comes out of his isolated zone and steps out to achieve his own spiritual rebirth. Based on psychoanalysis, this paper attempts to address inward struggles of Leo Finkle, an epitome of all humankind, and explore how he achieves his spiritual rebirth when he is confronted with conflicting reality, through which, we can also have a profound understanding of Malamud’s humanist care not only for Jewish people, but also for all human beings, that is to say, his concern about universal humanities such as mercy, redemption, spiritual rebirth so on and so forth. In this way, we may pay more attention to Jewish people and other marginalized social groups in today’s society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".