Grupo interventivo com genitores (as) de crianças vítimas de violência sexual
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This phenomenological-intervention research had as its main objective understanding the experience of being a parent of a child victim of sexual violence, seeking to re-signify reality and the elaboration of coping strategies. In three one-and-a-half-hour weekly meetings, five parents and the researcher themselves recorded the meaning of their experiences and encounters in Sense Version (SV). With the possession of all SVs, it was possible that the present suffering in the employees' lives is related to a slowness between denouncing the abuse and completing legal procedures. The process led the employees to change in modes of subjectivation, mainly due to the enlargement of the vision about themselves, which resulted in a re-signification of their own life history and the construction of future projects. In addition to the opportunity to minimize their suffering by sharing it with others, they have created strategies of coping with reality: to build social bonds to share their experiences, talk about their own suffering and take care of themselves. It was mainly concluded that the practice of the meetings was absorbed by the collaborators as a strategy of self-care, and the embracement offered must focus on them beyond the condition of parents of victims of sexual violence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it