Development and Evaluation of Model-Based Adaptive Signal Control for Congested Arterial Traffic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under congested conditions, the road traffic states of different arterial links will interact with each other; therefore, it is necessary to understand the behavior of traffic corridors and to investigate corridor-wide traffic coordinated control strategies. In order to achieve this, traffic flow models are applied in signal control to predict future traffic states. Optimization tools are used to search for the best sequence of future control decisions, based on predictions by traffic flow models. A number of model-based adaptive control strategies have been presented in the literature and have been proved effective in practice. However, most studies have modeled the traffic dynamic either at a link-based level or at an individual movement-based level. Moreover, the efficiency of corridor-wide coordination algorithms for congested large-scale networks still needs to be further improved. A hierarchical control structure is developed to divide the complex control problem into different control layers: the highest level optimizes the cycle length, the mid layer optimizes the offsets, and the Model Predictive Control (MPC) procedure is implemented in the lowest layer to optimize the split. In addition, there is an extra multi-modal priority control layer to provide priority for different travel modes. Firstly, MPC is applied to optimize the signal timing plans for arterial traffic. The objectives are to increase the throughput. A hybrid urban traffic flow model is proposed to provide relatively accurate predictions of the traffic state dynamic, which is capable of simulating queue evolutions among different lane groups in a specific link. Secondly, this study expands the dynamic queue concept to the corridor-wide coordination problem. The ideal offset and boundary offsets to avoid spillback and starvation are found based on the shockwave profiles at each signalized intersection. A new multi-objective optimization model based on the preemptive goal programming is proposed to find the optimal offset. Thirdly, the priority control problem is formulated into a multi-objective optimization model, which is solved with a Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm. Pareto-optimal front results are presented to evaluate the trade-off among different objectives and the most appropriate solution is chosen with high-level information. Performance of the new adaptive controller is verified with software-in-the-loop simulation. The applied simulation environment contains VISSIM with the ASC/3 module as the simulation environment and the control system as the solver. The simulation test bed includes two arterial corridors in Edmonton, Alberta. The simulation network was well calibrated and validated. The simulation results show that the proposed adaptive control methods outperform actuated control in increasing throughput, decreasing delay, and preventing queue spillback.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".