HisCoM-GGI: Hierarchical structural component analysis of gene–gene interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with common diseases, these observations are limited for fully explaining “missing heritability”. Determining gene–gene interactions (GGI) are one possible avenue for addressing the missing heritability problem. While many statistical approaches have been proposed to detect GGI, most of these focus primarily on SNP-to-SNP interactions. While there are many advantages of gene-based GGI analyses, such as reducing the burden of multiple-testing correction, and increasing power by aggregating multiple causal signals across SNPs in specific genes, only a few methods are available. In this study, we proposed a new statistical approach for gene-based GGI analysis, “Hierarchical structural CoMponent analysis of Gene–Gene Interactions” (HisCoM-GGI). HisCoM-GGI is based on generalized structured component analysis, and can consider hierarchical structural relationships between genes and SNPs. For a pair of genes, HisCoM-GGI first effectively summarizes all possible pairwise SNP–SNP interactions into a latent variable, from which it then performs GGI analysis. HisCoM-GGI can evaluate both gene-level and SNP-level interactions. Through simulation studies, HisCoM-GGI demonstrated higher statistical power than existing gene-based GGI methods, in analyzing a GWAS of a Korean population for identifying GGI associated with body mass index. Resultantly, HisCoM-GGI successfully identified 14 potential GGI, two of which, (NCOR2 [Formula: see text] SPOCK1) and (LINGO2 [Formula: see text] ZNF385D) were successfully replicated in independent datasets. We conclude that HisCoM-GGI method may be a valuable tool for genome to identify GGI in missing heritability, allowing us to better understand the biological genetic mechanisms of complex traits. We conclude that HisCoM-GGI method may be a valuable tool for genome to identify GGI in missing heritability, allowing us to better understand biological genetic mechanisms of complex traits. An implementation of HisCoM-GGI can be downloaded from the website ( http://statgen.snu.ac.kr/software/hiscom-ggi ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".