MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899272865 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v45i6.2673

Effect of Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream (EMLA®) on Pain of Intramuscular Fluzone® Injection

2018· article· en· W2899272865 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntramuscular injections and effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrilocaineAnesthesiaPlaceboLidocaineIntramuscular injectionLocal anestheticSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA® — Eutectic mixture of Local Anesthetics) in alleviating the pain of intramuscular injections was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. EMLA® or placebo cream was applied to the arms of 60 adult volunteers before receiving influenza virus vaccine (Fluzone®). Twenty-nine subjects received approximately 2.5 g of EMLA® cream and 31 subjects received approximately 2.5 g of an inert placebo cream under occlusion for 60-90 minutes. The cream was then removed and each subject received one 0.5 mL intramuscular injection of influenza virus vaccine using a 22 gauge one inch needle. Pain of needle puncture and pain of injection were both assessed by the subjects using a visual analog scale. EMLA® was associated with decreased needle puncture pain (p < 0.0002) and decreased pain of injection when compared to placebo (p = 0.0139). There was a significant correlation between scores of needle puncture pain and injection pain. Mild skin pallor was a common skin reaction from EMILA®· While the efficacy of EMLA® to alleviate pain of venipuncture is well documented, this is the first study to show the efficacy of EMLA ® for intramuscular injections. RESUME Une etude randomisee a double insu, en controle parallele avec placebo a permis d'evaluer la capacite de la Lidocaine-Prilocaine (creme EMLA® — melange eutectique d'anesthesiques locaux) a soulager la douleur causee par les injections intramusculaires. On a applique la creme EMLA® ou un placebo sur le bras de 60 volontaires adultes avant de leur injecter un vaccin viral contre la grippe (Fluzone®). Vingt-neuf (29) sujets ont ete traites avec la creme EMLA® et 31 avec le placebo. Tous ont recu une application d'environ 2,5 g de creme sous un pansement occlusif pendant 60 a 90 minutes. Apres l'elimination de la creme, on leur a injecte 0,5 mL de vaccin par voie intramusculaire au moyen d'une aiguille calibre 22 d'un pouce. Les sujets ont evalue la douleur causee par l’insertion de l'aiguille et par l'injection au moyen d'une echelle visuelle analogique. Comparativement au placebo, la creme EMLA® a attenue la douleur associee a l'insertion de l’aiguille (p < 0.0002) et a l’injection (P = 0,0139). On a note une correlation significative entre les cotes se rapportant a la douleur provoquee par l'insertion de l'aiguille et celles relatives a la douleur causee par l'injection. L'apparition d'une legere pâleur fut une reaction cutanee courante a l'application de la creme EMLA®. Il est bien etabli que cette derniere soulage la douleur due a la ponction veineuse, mais la presente etude est la premieree a demontrer son efficacite en cas d'injection intramusculaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it