MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899274513 · doi:10.4043/29126-ms

Finite Element Analysis of Flexible Pipe Tension Loads Due to Iceberg Interaction

2018· article· en· W2899274513 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaIcebergTension (geology)Submarine pipelineMarine engineeringFinite element methodEngineeringSeabedGeologyGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringStructural engineeringOceanographyMoment (physics)Sea ice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Offshore Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, development costs associated with iceberg protection pose significant challenges in terms of project execution and economics for marginal field subsea tie-backs. The current standard practice is to assume that if an iceberg makes contact with a subsea flowline, the flowline is dragged indefinitely imparting significant load to the connections at each end. To isolate flowlines from downstream and upstream assets, weak links are installed in the flowline that are designed to separate once a specified level of tension is reached. This prevents damage to wellheads and other subsea equipment and eliminates the possibility of uncontrolled hydrocarbon release. However, the weak links are very costly and possess inherent risk of failure, which can lead to an uncontrolled release of hydrocarbons. This paper addresses the requirement of weak links by analyzing the flowline tensions transmitted due to iceberg-flowline-soil interaction events. The assumption that an iceberg drags a flowline indefinetly imparting significant tension on the end connections can be challenged. This paper seeks to estimate the tension loads developed in an untrenched flexible flowline due to interaction with free-floating and gouging icebergs. Large deformation finite element analysis is utilized to simulate the iceberg-flowline-soil interaction scenario. The iceberg keel is idealized with shape and dimensions based on analysis of recent iceberg profiles. A sensitivity study is conducted to assess the influence of keel size, gouge width and depth on flowline tension developed throughout the flowline resting on very dense sand. The sand constitutive behavior is modelled using a user subroutine accounting for the effects of mean effective stress and relative density on the soil strength and volumetric response. The ice-flowline-soil interaction mechanisms are detailed for free-floating and gouging interaction events. During interaction with free-floating icebergs, the flowline is typically depressed into the seabed, and the keel rides over the flowline. The gouging interaction scenario simulates the complex interaction between the frontal soil mound developed during the gouging process and the untrenched flowline. This paper provides new insight into the iceberg-flowline-soil interaction scenario that has not been examined previously. Based on the analysis results presented, an alternative strategy to mitigate tension transfer to downstream and upstream assets is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it