Del cine chileno del exilio a la inmigración portuguesa en Canadá. Un estudio sobre Il n’y a pas d’oubli (1975) y Les Borges (1978)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article studies two films directed by Chilean filmmakers exiled in Montreal and produced by the National Film Board of Canada: Il n’y a pas d’oubli/There Is No Forgetting (1975), which comprises three medium-length pieces by Rodrigo Gonzalez, Marilu Mallet, and Jorge Fajardo, and Les Borges/The Borges , directed by Mallet. I propose that both works offer a crucial understanding of the cinematic representation and social discourses of political refugees and migrants. The first film is focused in the Chilean case. It presents stories that stand for a theory of exile structured in three different phases. On the other hand, the second is a documentary portrait of a family of Portuguese migrants in Montreal, observed through the eyes of a Chilean filmmaker. These films correspond with the corpus known as Chilean exile cinema, but they need to be looked at through a more complex lens. This article suggests that both works establish connections between the phenomenon of Latin American political exile, Portuguese labor immigration, and Quebecois nationalism. There Is No Forgetting and The Borges offer not just a representation of national communities of refugees, but a theoretical and cultural discourse about displacement within a context of early globalization. Thus, the study of both films provides us with a valuable historical precedent for understanding the current global crisis of refugees and displaced people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".