Three Formulations of Sling Load Dynamics for UAV Motion Planning and Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the sling load dynamics of an aerial vehicle carrying a payload are investigated by employing three formulations of the governing equations. They are the hybrid formulation where the system exists in either a taut cable or slack cable configuration, with appropriate treatment of the transition between the two; the linear complementarity problem (LCP) formulation where the cable constraints are imposed as linear complementarity conditions and finally, the lumped parameter formulation where the cable is modelled with a series of spring-mass elements. The hybrid and LCP formulations neglect the elasticity of the cable while the lumped parameter model explicitly accounts for the elastic properties of the cable, albeit in a discrete way. The importance of the incorporation of elastic properties of the cable on the system is investigated for the variation in solution space of the payload. The three formulations are compared numerically, for information on the computational cost, motion of the payload, and tension profile, for several aerial maneuvers, including an aggressive obstacle avoidance with a window clearance flight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".