MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899337063 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v30i2.5458

Stitching Together an Arts-based Inquiry with Indigenous Communities in Canada and Chile

2018· article· fr· W2899337063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation in Rural Contexts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesThe artsIndigenousSociologyArtVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La recherche et l’apprentissage communautaires ne peuvent jamais être prescrits. L’étude intitulée « Intergenerational Learning in Indigenous Textile Communities of Practice » (« L’apprentissage intergénérationnel au sein de communautés de pratique des textiles autochtones »), financée par le Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines, illustre bien ce point à plusieurs égards. Bien que cette étude soit conçue comme recherche communautaire, au début, elle n’était pas comprise comme étant axée sur les arts : sa dimension artistique a émergé au cours de son évolution. À la fois la collecte de données et la mobilisation des méthodes de recherche étaient fondées sur les arts. L’étude a fourni d’importantes leçons sur l’apprentissage informel, autochtone et intergénérationnel au sein des communautés de pratique des textiles autochtones, notamment celles des perleuses et des tisseuses au Canada et au Chili.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it