Overcoming the Undesirable CRISPR-Cas9 Expression in Gene Correction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The CRISPR-Cas9 system is attractive for gene therapy, as it allows for permanent genetic correction. However, as a new technology, Cas9 gene editing in clinical applications faces major challenges, such as safe delivery and gene targeting efficiency. Cas9 is a foreign protein to recipient cells; thus, its expression may prompt the immune system to eliminate gene-edited cells. To overcome these challenges, we have engineered a novel delivery system based on the helper-dependent adenoviral (HD-Ad) vector, which is capable of delivering genes to airway basal stem cells in vivo. Using this system, we demonstrate the successful co-delivery of both CRISPR-Cas9/single-guide RNA and the LacZ reporter or CFTR gene as donor DNA to cultured cells. HD-Ad vector genome integrity is compromised following donor DNA integration, and because the CRISPR-Cas9/single-guide RNA and donor DNA are carried on the same vector, CRISPR-Cas9 expression is concurrently eliminated. Thus, we show the feasibility of site-specific gene targeting with limited Cas9 expression. In addition, we achieved stable CFTR expression and functional correction in cultured cells following successful gene integration. The CRISPR-Cas9 system is attractive for gene therapy, as it allows for permanent genetic correction. However, as a new technology, Cas9 gene editing in clinical applications faces major challenges, such as safe delivery and gene targeting efficiency. Cas9 is a foreign protein to recipient cells; thus, its expression may prompt the immune system to eliminate gene-edited cells. To overcome these challenges, we have engineered a novel delivery system based on the helper-dependent adenoviral (HD-Ad) vector, which is capable of delivering genes to airway basal stem cells in vivo. Using this system, we demonstrate the successful co-delivery of both CRISPR-Cas9/single-guide RNA and the LacZ reporter or CFTR gene as donor DNA to cultured cells. HD-Ad vector genome integrity is compromised following donor DNA integration, and because the CRISPR-Cas9/single-guide RNA and donor DNA are carried on the same vector, CRISPR-Cas9 expression is concurrently eliminated. Thus, we show the feasibility of site-specific gene targeting with limited Cas9 expression. In addition, we achieved stable CFTR expression and functional correction in cultured cells following successful gene integration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".