MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899350226 · doi:10.1115/detc2018-85701

Finite Element Thermal Analysis of Melt Pool in Selective Laser Melting Process

2018· article· en· W2899350226 on OpenAlexaff
Zhibo Luo, Yaoyao Fiona Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermalSelective laser meltingMaterials scienceProcess (computing)FusionEnthalpy of fusionFinite element methodMelting pointPoint (geometry)Mechanical engineeringComputer scienceHeat transferProcess engineeringMechanicsComposite materialStructural engineeringMicrostructureEngineeringThermodynamicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selective laser melting is one of the powder bed fusion processes which fabricates a part through layer-wised method. Due to the ability to build a customized and complex part, selective laser melting process has been broadly studied in academic and applied in industry. However, rapidly changed thermal cycles and extremely high-temperature gradients among the melt pool induce a periodically changed thermal stress in solidified layers and finally result in a distorted part. Therefore, the temperature distribution in the melt pool and the size and shape of the melt pool directly determine the mechanical and geometrical property of final part. As experimental trial-and-error method takes a huge amount of cost, different numerical methods have been adopted to estimate the transient temperature and thermal stress distribution in the melt pool and powder bed. The most existing research utilizes the moving Gaussian point heat source to model the profile of the melt pool, which consumes a significant amount of computational cost and cannot be used to implement the part-level simulation. This research proposes a new line heat source to replace the moving point heat source. Some efforts are applied to reduce the computational cost. Specifically, a relatively large step size is used for the line heat source to reduce the number of time steps. In addition, a mesh refinement scheme is adopted to reduce the number of cells in each time step by refining the mesh close to the heat source and coarsening the mesh far away from it. On the other hand, efforts are implemented to increase the accuracy of the simulation result. Temperature-dependent material properties are considered in this FE framework. In addition, material transition among powder, liquid, and solid are incorporated in the developed FE framework. In this study, temperature simulation of one scanning track based on self-developed FE code is applied for Stainless Steel 316L. The simulation results show that the temperature distribution and history of melt pool within line heat source are comparable to that of the moving Gaussian point heat source. While the simulation time is reduced by more than two times depending on the length of line heat input. Therefore, this FE model can be used to numerically investigate the process parameters and help to control the quality of the final part.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207