MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Moiré Valleytronics: Realizing Dense Arrays of Topological Helical Channels

2018· article· en· W2899410593 on OpenAlexafffund
Chen Hu, Vincent Michaud-Rioux, Wang Yao, Hong Guo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersResearch Grants Council, University Grants CommitteeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsValleytronicsTopology (electrical circuits)Moiré patternCurvatureParallelogramMaterials sciencePhysicsBerry connection and curvatureGrapheneOpticsCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyGeometryGeometric phaseMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a general and robust platform, the moiré valleytronics, to realize high-density arrays of 1D topological helical channels in real materials at room temperature. We demonstrate the idea using a long-period 1D moiré pattern of graphene on hBN by first-principles calculation. Through calculating the Berry curvature and topological charge of the electronic structure associated with various local graphene/hBN stackings in the moiré pattern, it is revealed that the helical channel arrays originate intrinsically from the periodic modulation of the local topological orders by the moiré pattern. For a freestanding wavelike moiré pattern, two groups of helical channel arrays are spatially separated out of plane, validating the structural robustness of the moiré topology. The generality and experimental feasibility of moiré valleytronics are demonstrated by investigating a broad range of moiré systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207