MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899417432

Théâtralité de l’éphémère et poétique du béton: Silo City, Buffalo (États-Unis)

2016· article· fr· W2899417432 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Catherine Parayre

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesEphemeraCartographyArt historyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On 22 April 2017, took place Post-Industrial Ephemera: Soundings, Gestures, and Poetics in the magnificent site of Silo City, Buffalo, at the North of New York State (USA). Reinhard Reitzenstein and I myself, curators of this programme, opened this common space to eighteen artists from two universities nearby Niagara River: SUNY-Buffalo in the United States and Brock University in Canada. We gave them the opportunity to explore issues like «dispersion» and «ephemera» for answering the colossal architecture of those old grain silos. In addition to varied contributions in the field of the Visual Arts, the programme included several musical and chorographical performances. After having been opened during several months to develop artistic practices that were very varied, Post-Industrial Ephemera highlighted a concept provided by the Performing Arts, although this event by itself did not contain any Theatre Performance. It is the concept of Theatricality. In Silo City, it defines the perception of the place, the election of the disposition of the several contributions in the interior of the silos, the performances included in the programme, and,\nafter all, our approach as curators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207