MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2899442417 · doi:10.1155/2018/5942686

Determining Causal Factors of Severe Crashes on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana

2018· article· en· W2899442417 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sahima Nazneen, Mahdi Rezapour, Khaled Ksaibati

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFederal Highway AdministrationUniversity of Wyoming
KeywordsCrashReservationTransport engineeringLogistic regressionPeck (Imperial)Government (linguistics)Forensic engineeringGeographyEngineeringEnvironmental healthMedicinePolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indian reservations have been struggling with the highest rate of crashes that lead to fatal and incapacitating injuries across the United States for decades. The US government has been striving to improve roadway safety on Indian reservations to reduce such crashes. However, the rustic nature of the reservations, issues of jurisdictional coordination and collaboration, inadequate resources, and limited crash data make it challenging for the tribes to reduce the number of severe crashes. Determining factors associated with crashes is one of the most efficient and effective ways to select appropriate countermeasures for improving roadway safety and reducing crashes. Due to the unique nature of each of the reservations, factors contributing to crashes vary across the reservations as well as across the different roadways within the reservations. Only a few researches have investigated factors contributing to crashes on Indian reservations, and no studies have determined the factors separately for different roadways within the reservations. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the contributory factors to fatal and injury crashes in the Fort Peck Indian Reservation (FPIR). The crash database covering a ten-year period from 2005 to 2014 was obtained from the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT). During this period, 940 crashes occurred on state, county, city, and tribally owned roads. Binary logistic regression models were developed to determine the factors associated with fatal and injury crashes for all roads within the FPIR and separately for the roads maintained by different agencies. The analysis identified unique contributory factors to fatal or injury crashes for different roadways, which justified separating crashes based on different road types. Impaired driving, adverse weather condition, collision with a ditch/embankment, pedestrian involvement, and overturn/rollover crashes were some of the factors that significantly contribute to increasing the risk associated with fatal and injury crashes. Impaired driving was found to be the most significant factor contributing to crash severity in all three roadways. Indian reservation roads were found to be possessing the highest risk of fatal and injury crashes due to impaired driving among the three roadway systems. The results of the study provide the Fort Peck Tribes with the opportunity to determine the countermeasures for safety improvements on their roadway systems efficiently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced Transportation→Same topicTraffic and Road Safety→French-language works237,207→