TEMPOROMANDİBULAR EKLEM RAHATSIZLIKLARINDA OKLUZAL FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı okluzal faktörler ile temporomandibular eklem (TME) rahatsızlıkların ilişkisinin incelenmesidir. Materyal ve Metod: Çene yüz ağrıları kliniğine art arda gelen hastaların kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. TME rahatsızlıkları için araştırma tanı kriterleri (ATK/TME) kullanılarak TME rahatsızlığı tanısı konuldu. Angle sınıflaması, anterior ve lateral rehberlik faktörleri belirlendi. Ki- kare ve Continuity Yates düzeltmesi kullanılarak verilerin niteliksel karşılaştırması yapıldı. Bulgular: TME rahatsızlığı teşhisi konulan bireylerde kanin koruyuculu okluzal rehberliğine eklem rahatsızlığı bulunmayanlardan daha fazla oranda rastlanıldı. Myofasiyal ağrı teşhisi konulan bireylerde anterior rehberlik varlığı, disk deplasmanı teşhisi konulan bireylerde Angle Sınıf I molar ilişkisi, artraljisi bulunanlarda ise kanin koruyuculu okluzyon diğer alt gruplardan daha fazla oranda tespit edildi. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak seçilmiş okluzal faktörlerle temporomandibular eklem rahatsızlıkları arasında ilişki bulunmuştur.Temporomandibular eklem rahatsızlıkları değerlendirilirken bu faktörler göz önünde bulundurul- malıdır ancak temporomandibular rahatsızlıkların etyolojisinin multifaktöriyel olduğu unutulmamalıdır Anahtar Kelimeler: Okluzyon, Malokluzyon, Temporomandibular eklem EVALUATION OF OCCLUSAL FACTORS IN TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT DISORDERS ABSTRACT Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the relation between main occlusal factors and temporomandibular disorders. Material and Methods: Records of patients attending orofacial pain clinic were screened retrospectively.The diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders were made according to research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD). Angle classification, the type of occlusal guiding pattern were determined. Chi-square and Yates’s continuity correction were used to compare qualitative data. Results: Canine guided occlusion were found more frequently in subjects with temporomandibular disorders than in subjects without temporomandibular disorders. It was also observed that prevalance of anterior guidance in subjects with myofacial pain, Angle Class I molar relation in subjects with disc displacement, canine guidance occlusion in subjects with artraljia was higher than other subgroups of temporomandibular disorders. Conclusion: In conclusion, it was found that there is an association between selected occlusal factors and temporomandibular disorders. Meanwhile, multifac- torial etiology should be kept in mind while evaluating impact of occlusal factors on temporomandibular disorders. Keywords: Occlusion, Malocclusion, Temporo- mandibular joint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".