MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899473997 · doi:10.2322/tastj.16.657

Weightless Construction of High Tower to the Stratosphere

2018· article· en· W2899473997 on OpenAlex
Ryojiro Akiba, Ken Higuchi, Ryuichi Mitsuhashi, Riho HIRAMOTO, Jun’ya Sasaki

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsTowerStratosphereRopeAerospaceRealization (probability)Aerospace engineeringInflatableBridge (graph theory)AeronauticsEngineeringMeteorologyMarine engineeringEnvironmental scienceCivil engineeringStructural engineeringPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Construction of a high tower to the stratosphere was first proposed by Canadian Thoth Company. Because of its enormous scale, people are hesitant to implement the project immediately. This paper proposes several next steps to its realization. Fundamental aspects of the structure are presented. Based on the models, treated are a long bridge over Tsugaru Straight, medium height towers for an inter-city rope way or a suspended rocket launcher in addition to the stratospheric tower. For a light weight structure, some inflatable models are tested to verify its effectiveness to the aerospace field of application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it