Les sentiers du rêve, et les pratiques divinatoires des atnas et de leurs voisins Athapaskans septentrionaux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les pratiques divinatoires des Athapaskans septentrionaux (dont les Atnas du Copper River, et les Nabesnas de la rivière Tanana) abordent les besoins de prévoir, percevoir et prévenir le futur de façons multiples et à de nombreux niveaux dans un ensemble complexe. Certaines pratiques simples sont utilisées quotidiennement par tous les adultes, d’autres demandent un appareillage rituel plus élaboré qui fait partie de ce que nous appelons le chamanisme, et qui pour les Athapaskans se définit par le recours au rêve. Mais en fait, toutes les pratiques divinatoires débouchent sur l’articulation qu’opèrent les Athapascans entre le monde du rêve, ou plutôt, la perspective onirique sur le monde, et le monde concret, ou plutôt, la perspective éveillée sur le monde. La plupart des techniques de divination offrent des modes de passage ou de communication d’une perspective à l’autre, en particulier des modes qui passent par le corps. Ce faisant, elles dépendent de certains aspects de la vision du monde nord-athapaskanne concernant, entre autres, la notion de personne et l’expérience de liens mentaux entre tous les êtres vivants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".