MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899507408 · doi:10.1088/1361-6439/aaedf9

Dynamic bifurcation MEMS gas sensors

2018· article· en· W2899507408 on OpenAlexafffund
Majed Al‐Ghamdi, Mahmoud Khater, Katherine M. E. Stewart, Ayman M. Alneamy, Eihab Abdel‐Rahman, Alexander Penlidis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsKing Abdulaziz City for Science and TechnologyJazan University
KeywordsBifurcationLaser Doppler vibrometerSensitivity (control systems)Microelectromechanical systemsMaterials scienceAcousticsChemistryControl theory (sociology)OptoelectronicsPhysicsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A novel electrostatic MEMS gas sensor is demonstrated. It employs a dynamic-bifurcation detection technique. The sensor detects ethanol vapor in a binary mode, reporting ON-state (1) for concentrations above a preset threshold and OFF-state (0) for concentrations below the threshold. The sensing mechanism exploits the qualitative difference between the sensor state before and after the dynamic pull-in bifurcation. Experimental demonstration was carried out using a laser Doppler vibrometer to measure the sensor response before and after detection. The sensor was able to detect ethanol vapor concentrations as 100 ppb in dry nitrogen. A closed-form expression for the sensitivity of dynamic bifurcation sensors was derived. It captures the dependence of sensitivity on the sensor dimensions, material properties, and electrostatic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Micromechanics and MicroengineeringSame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207