COVARIATION BETWEEN CHANGE IN NEUROTICISM AND CHANGE IN COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent observational research examining personality at the intra-individual level has identified a consistent pattern between personality trait stability, in contrast to trait change or variability, and maintaining higher levels of cognitive functioning. However, no study has examined dynamic change in both personality traits and cognitive functioning. Using data from the OCTO-Twin Study (N=539), a series of bivariate latent growth curve models were fitted to examine change in both personality traits and cognitive functioning, and the covariation between that change. Controlling for age, sex, education, depressive symptoms, and incident dementia diagnosis, analyses revealed that the slope of neuroticism increased as the slope of block design decreased. Consistent with previous research, incident dementia diagnosis was consistently associated with linear increases in neuroticism and linear decreases in cognition. Identification of constructs associated with cognitive decline may aid in early care strategies and facilitate development of screening assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it