MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899606847 · doi:10.1149/ma2018-02/16/710

(Invited) Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Material Based Nanotube Tunnel Field Effect Transistor with Core-Shell Gate Stacks

2018· article· en· W2899606847 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad M. Hussain, Nazek El‐Atab, Amir N. Hanna, Aftab M. Hussain, Hossain M. Fahad, Sohail F. Shaikh

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum-Dot Cellular Automata
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCMOSTransistorMaterials scienceNanotechnologySiliconScalabilityField-effect transistorElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsEngineering physicsElectronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the last forty years, complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology has made tremendous progress and its advancement has enabled physical scaling of CMOS electronics technology. Physical scaling has offered us higher data processing performance but with the increased penalty of power consumption. As we approach physical scaling, alternative materials, device architecture, physics and integration strategies have been proposed to overcome this fundamental physical roadblock. This problem specially exaggerates for implantable and bioelectronics where we need higher data performance but at the same time lower power consumption. Specially body integration restricts heat dissipation related power consumption to 40 mW/cm2. Therefore, we have conceptualized a newly minted nanotube architecture with the classical crystalline material such as silicon (Si), Silicon-Germanium (SiGe), Germanium (Ge), III-V materials and applying tunnel physics we have developed an integration strategy where a core-shell gate stacks in a coin like configuration (sensors on sensing surface connected via through-polymer-via (TPV) to homo and heterogeneous crystalline materials based nanotube tunnel FETs with core-shell gate stacks on the other side for higher information processing performance and lower power consumption. In this talk, we will discuss this novel device architecture, its physics, choice of materials and integration strategy specially for brain-machine interfacing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicQuantum-Dot Cellular AutomataFrench-language works237,207