Effect of Revolutionary Pitch on Interface Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of Friction Stir Lap Welds of AA6082-T6 to Galvanized DP800
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Friction stir lap welding of 1.5-mm thick 6082-T6 aluminum alloy to 2-mm thick galvanized DP800 steel (Zn-coated) was carried out. Optimal welding conditions were obtained aiming to defect-free joints with good mechanical properties. The interfacial intermetallic compounds (IMCs) at the stir zone and hook zone were characterized under different revolutionary pitches. With a revolutionary pitch of 1.0 mm/rev, maximum joint strength reached 71% of that of the aluminum alloy. In the meantime, the average thickness of IMC layer is less than 1 μm; Al3.2Fe in the Al-rich side and Al5Fe2 in the Fe-rich side at the interfaces of stir zone while Al6Fe and nanocrystalline close to Al3.2Fe at the interface of the hook zone. At a relatively lower revolutionary pitch (0.5 mm/rev), Zn was found with the aggregation of Si and Mn at the hook-zone interface, leading to the generation of Al-Fe-Si phase thus decreasing the thickness of the IMC layer. In the stir zone, the revolutionary pitch has a significant influence on the interfacial microstructures. The interfacial IMC layer at 1.0 mm/rev is simple and flat, but the one at 0.5 mm/rev becomes thicker and more complex. Stir zone aluminum under different revolutionary pitches is similar in microhardness and tensile behavior. The mechanical response of joints was modeled based on linear mixture law with an iso-strain assumption and neglection of the IMC layer. The modeling results are in good agreement with the experimental ones indicating the resultant interfaces act as good as the good boundaries between dissimilar Al/steel joints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".