Refiguring Red Vienna: Alternative Forms of Currency and Community in Michael Riebl’s <i>Planet Ottakring</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article’s focus is Planet Ottakring (dir. Michael Riebl, 2015), a socially aware romantic comedy in which an alternative currency is used to free one of Vienna’s most rapidly gentrifying districts from the clutches of a local loan shark. In establishing Riebl’s film as a stunning, if unusual and underappreciated, critique of the banking industry’s role in the ongoing global financial crisis, the article situates Planet Ottakring as a response to the precarity inherent in neoliberal approaches to home ownership, one that is very much in keeping with the Austro-Marxism that emerged as a reaction to the socio-political and cultural battles that continue to be waged in Vienna’s outer districts. Riebl’s depiction of organized struggle shows how an alternative form of community comes into being, not because the people involved happen to live in the same district but because they share in a communal currency that stands for a shared set of values and provides a sense of belonging, an anticapitalist sense of Heimat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".