Les défis éducatifs du changement climatique : La pertinence de la dimension sociale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les programmes éducatifs centrés sur la problématique du changement climatique sont le plus souvent axés sur des processus d’alphabétisation scientifique basés sur l’information issue des recherches en science du climat, sans considérer l’expérience sociale ni les dynamiques culturelles qui interviennent dans la construction des représentations sociales de ce phénomène. Or la prise en compte de cette dimension phénoménologique des réalités climatiques est essentielle pour relever adéquatement les défis de l’éducation et de la communication. Le principal obstacle au nécessaire changement social réside dans la nature structurelle de ce problème complexe, incluant ses dimensions morale, socio-politique, culturelle, socio-cognitive et psychosociale, qui conditionnent les représentations sociales et entravent l’adoption de changements significatifs dans les modes de vie individuels et collectifs liés aux activités qui bouleversent le climat. Dans cet article, trois types d’obstacles sont analysés et des propositions sont formulées afin de les surmonter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".