MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899804197

Beasiswa 5 Benua : 100 Kiat Berburu Beasiswa Luar Negeri

2014· article· id· W2899804197 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmad Fuadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipGeorge (robot)HumanitiesLibrary sciencePolitical scienceManagementArtArt historyLawComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ingin belajar ke luar negeri tanpa biaya? Kalau Anda adalah karyawan yang ingin kuliah lagi, pelajar yang sedang mencari sekolah, atau orang tua yang ingin menyekolahkan anak sampai luar negeri, temukan caranya di buku penting ini. Ahmad Fuadi telah berhasil mendapatkan 10 beasiswa, fellowship, exchange program, dan residency dari Amerika Serikat, Inggris, Kanada, Singapura sampai Italia. Apa saja itu? - The Fulbright Scholarship, The George Washington University, Amerika Serikat, 1999-2001 - The British Chevening Award, University of London, UK, 2004-2005 - The Ford Foundation Award 1999-2000 - Columbian School of Arts and Sciences Award, The George Washington University, 2000-2001 - CASE Media Fellowship, University of Maryland, College Park, 2002 - Indonesian Cultural Foundation Inc. Award, 2000-2001 - SIF-ASEAN Visiting Student Fellowship, National University of Singapore, 1997 - Youth Exchange Program, Indonesia-Canada, 1995 - Bellagio Art Residency Program, Bellagio Center, Lake Como, Italy, 2012 - Artist-in-Resident, University of California at Berkeley, Amerika Serikat, 2014 Simak 100 kiat berburu beasiswa luar negeri ala Fuadi di buku ini .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1220.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207