Object-based urban landcover mapping methodology using high spatial resolution imagery and airborne laser scanning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mapping landcover in cities is essential for urban ecology and landuse management, yet urban landcover is often highly heterogeneous at fine spatial scales. Pixel-based approaches are shown to be less successful for effectively mapping urban landcover due to high heterogeneity, with relatively low accuracies reported despite the use of high spatial resolution optical imagery. Alternatively, geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA) has yielded higher accuracies across a range of urban applications. We combine three-dimensional (3-D) information from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data with RapidEye high-spatial-resolution imagery in a GEOBIA approach to classify urban landcover in a large metropolitan region in Vancouver, Canada. Results indicate that 12 urban classes could be accurately mapped at 2-m spatial resolution across 150,000 ha with an overall accuracy of 88% (kappa 0.87). Though 5-m RapidEye multispectral pixels were often mixed in heterogeneous urban areas, the additional insight provided by the 3-D ALS information enabled accurate classification of fine spatial objects such as street trees and single-family dwellings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it