MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899821127 · doi:10.1680/jenes.18.00018

Phosphorus behaviour in a river during periods of drought and rain

2018· article· en· W2899821127 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Charles Carneiro, Maurício Bergamini Scheer, Gustavo Rafael Collere Possetti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal do Paraná
KeywordsEnvironmental sciencePhosphorusHydrology (agriculture)Drainage basinStructural basinStreamflowGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The behaviour of phosphorus forms and loads under conditions of drought and rainfall and based on real measurements was studied in the Timbú River Basin, an important water source in the metropolitan region of Curitiba, Paraná State, Brazil. Quantitative and qualitative chronosequential analyses were performed in different points of the river during a period of drought and every 5–10 min before, during and after rainfall in the basin. The main results showed that the phosphorus load at the river mouth during drought periods was 2·8 kg/d, five times lower than the normal flow of 8·8 kg/d. At its peak during medium rainfall, the load reached 175·3 kg/d, highlighting the significant influence of diffuse loads in the catchment area. The parameters total phosphorus and reactive phosphorus differed based on river compartments and land uses, mainly urban, agricultural and preserved areas. Therefore, basin action plans must consider varying weather conditions, including both drought and rainy periods, and implement long-term monitoring programmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207