MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899827171 · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2018.2813891

Guest Editors’ Introduction: Special Issue on Data-Driven Dependability and Security

2018· article· en· W2899827171 on OpenAlexaff
Domenico Cotroneo, Karthik Pattabiraman, Antonio Pecchia

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDependabilityComputer sciencePublicationData securityComputer securityData integrityData scienceSoftware engineeringEncryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The six papers in this special issue aim to concentrate novel contributions addressing dependability and security of computer systems through data analysis, and to publish consolidated research results focusing on data-driven methodologies, measurements from production systems, and analysis of large datasets. This information provides valuable contributions related to log-based measurements, operating systems dependability, and attack detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure ComputingSame topicSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityFrench-language works237,207