<i>Heimat</i> as Communist Utopia or <i>Leerstelle</i>: Yoko Tawada’s Naked Eye
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kleist Prize recipient Yoko Tawada’s work is often interpreted in terms of cultural and linguistic difference. This article offers a different, materialist reading of her 2004 novel Das nackte Auge (The Naked Eye). Tawada’s text here emerges as a critique of racial capital in the postsocialist condition. Structured textual gaps or Leerstellen—not as text-reader interaction but as “omission of the field to come” (Ernst Bloch)—delineate in literary form an alternative idea of communism: a utopian definition of Heimat (homeland) contesting precarious actualities. The novel’s least verisimilar episode indicates that even in Das nackte Auge’s most avant-garde moments, Tawada implies a peripheral-utopian realism that aspires to map and at once look beyond global capital. Offering new perspectives on Tawada’s work, the article’s further aim is to make the case for thinking difference differently. Following the introduction, the first section establishes the novel’s implicit critique of racial capital by reading three textual vignettes through materialist antiracisms. The second section connects this critique with peripheral realism as a framework for contemporary Marxian aesthetics. The close analysis in the third section fuses historical materialism with attention to the text’s materiality to develop the formal argument concerning structured textual gaps. Juxtaposing Das nackte Auge’s “Western” (capitalist) and “Eastern” (socialist) imaginaries, the final two sections think through the Left’s double impasse in the postindustrial, postsocialist present to address the broader stakes—envisioning a concrete utopian horizon for radical Left politics and aesthetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".