MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899891241 · doi:10.18162/ritpu-2018-v15n2-03

Comment les futurs enseignants sont-ils formés aux compétences informationnelles et comment prévoient-ils les enseigner? Une étude exploratoire menée au Québec (Canada)

2018· article· fr· W2899891241 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gabriel Dumouchel, Thierry Karsenti

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational Strategies and Epistemologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

devant l'importance capitale pour les lves de savoir chercher, valuer et utiliser de l'information sur le Web l're de Google, cette tude vise mieux comprendre comment les futurs enseignants du qubec sont forms pour enseigner la recherche d'information et comment ils prvoient le faire. nos rsultats montrent qu'ils reoivent une formation initiale nettement insuffisante et que la majorit d'entre eux comptent n'enseigner que les bases de la recherche d'information sur le Web avec Google. nous concluons en analysant ces rsultats la lumire de la littrature tout en offrant des pistes de recommandations en vue de bonifier la formation des enseignants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaireSame topicEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesFrench-language works237,207