EXTH-74. MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF ANTI-TUMOR ACTION OF TTFIELDS DETERMINED BY MEASUREMENTS AND MODELING OF ELECTRO-CONDUCTIVE PROPERTIES OF MICROTUBULES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biological effects of AC electric fields at frequencies between 100–300 kHz discovered a decade ago are being applied to cancer cells as a therapeutic modality in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). They are called Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) as they disrupt cell division. Based on our electro-conductive measurements and modeling, we provide an assessment of possible molecular-level mechanisms. Computer simulations and experimental measurements carried out for microtubules and actin filaments are presented. Charge and dipole values for monomers and dimers as well as polymerized forms of these proteins are summarized. Continuum approximations for cable equations describing actin filaments and microtubules compare favorably to measurements in buffer solutions showing soliton waves and transistor-like amplification of ionic signals, respectively. AC Conductivity and capacitance of tubulin and microtubules have been measured and modeled in the range of frequencies between 100 kHz and 1 MHz. A dramatic change in conductivity occurs when tubulin forms microtubules. In living cells, this signals a conductive phase transition coinciding with mitosis in dividing cells. This process is allowed by TTField penetration into the cleavage furrow in dividing cells and provides the most significant mechanistic explanation of the observed effects. We provide estimates of the forces, energies and power involved in the action of TTFields on microtubules and kinesin motors. These calculations are compared and contrasted with typical values experienced at a cell level and provide strong arguments for real physical effects of TTFields in dividing cells. We also show results of DLS and TEM measurements on microtubules and tubulin oligomers in solution, which allow us to quantify these processes under controlled conditions. In conclusion, the most likely candidates to provide a quantitative explanation of these effects are ionic condensation waves around microtubules as well as dielectrophoretic effects on the dipole moments of microtubules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".