MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2899989802 · doi:10.2118/193065-ms

Overview of Reservoir Deposits in the Pike and Jackfish Oil Sands Project Areas, Southern Athabasca Oil Sands, Canada

2018· article· en· W2899989802 on OpenAlexaffabout
Greg M. Baniak, E. Matt Caddel, Kelly G. Kingsmith

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsDevon Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFaciesOil sandsFluvialSedimentary depositional environmentPalaeogeographyDiachronousPaleontologyGeochemistryOil in placeCretaceousPetrophysicsStructural basinAsphaltPetroleumArchaeologyGeotechnical engineeringVolcanismTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation in western Canada has over 1.8 trillion barrels of bitumen resource in place. Due to the bitumen in its natural state having a very low API (6-12°) and corresponding high viscosity, traditional primary (pump jacks) and secondary (water flood) recovery techniques cannot be used. Instead, economic extraction of the bitumen occurs via surface mining and subsurface steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD). Using the Pike and Jackfish oil sands project areas as a case study, it will be shown that successful SAGD operations requires a thorough understanding of the depositional fabric and stratigraphic architecture of the reservoir. Within the study area, reservoir intervals in the form of cross-bedded sandstones and sandy inclined heterolithic strata (IHS) are present within both the middle and upper McMurray. Overlying the middle McMurray are upper McMurray parasequence cycles reflective of brackish bays and deltaic embayment deposits. In many areas, however, these parasequences are absent and instead substituted by fluvial channels with brackish water overprint. The facies within these fluvial channels are very similar in character to the those seen within the middle McMurray. To help progress our understanding of baffles and barriers to flow within these aforementioned reservoir facies, dip meter and seismic data are presented as data that can be used. From this, a better understanding of the complex interplay of facies and stratigraphic relationships can be made. More importantly, clearer insights into SAGD performance (pre- and post-steam) can also be achieved. Using the McMurray Formation as an underpinning, the wider implications of understanding fluvial sedimentation will be addressed by using reservoirs from the Middle East as examples. For example, many siliciclastic reservoirs in locations such as Kuwait (Wara Formation) and Iraq (Zubair Formation) are also influenced to a large degree by fluvial sedimentation. Not unlike SAGD, any successful secondary recovery techniques applied within these reservoirs will also require a detailed characterization of the channel stacking patterns and channel orientations prior to implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→