MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899989984 · doi:10.22323/1.334.0230

Gaussian states for the variational study of (1+1)-dimensional lattice gauge models

2019· preprint· en· W2899989984 on OpenAlexafffund
Stefan Kuehn, Pablo Sala, Tao Shi, Mari Carmen Bañuls, Eugene Demler, J. I. Cirac

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of The 36th Annual International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2018) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchDivision of Materials ResearchCenter for Ultracold Atoms, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyMultidisciplinary University Research InitiativeInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueQuantERAGovernment of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAnsatzPhysicsLattice field theoryLattice gauge theoryGaussianGauge theoryUnitary stateLattice (music)Tensor (intrinsic definition)Hamiltonian lattice gauge theoryTheoretical physicsMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsStatistical physicsMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a variational ansatz based on Gaussian states for (1+1)-dimensional lattice gauge models. To this end we identify a set of unitary transformations which decouple the gauge degrees of freedom from the matter fields. Using our ansatz, we study static aspects as well as real-time dynamics of string breaking in two (1+1)-dimensional theories, namely QED and two-color QCD. We show that our ansatz captures the relevant features and is in excellent agreement with data from numerical calculations with tensor networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of The 36th Annual International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2018)Same topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207