MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2899995643 · doi:10.1002/mmce.21599

A hexa-band dual-sense circularly polarized antenna for WLAN/Wi-MAX/SDARS and C-band applications

2018· article· en· W2899995643 on OpenAlexaff
Maksud Alam, Mainuddin Mainuddin, Mirza Tariq Beg, Sachin Kumar, Karumudi Rambabu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMinistry of Electronics and Information technology
KeywordsGround planeMonopole antennaCircular polarizationPhysicsOpticsMulti-band deviceTurnstile antennaAntenna (radio)HEXAPolarization (electrochemistry)TelecommunicationsComputer scienceMicrostripChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a compact single fed hexa-band circularly polarized (CP) monopole antenna using split ring resonators (SRRs) on the partial ground plane is designed and experimentally investigated. The loaded SRR elements generate multiple circularly polarized bands along with a reduction in antenna size. The multiband can be controlled by changing the configuration of SRRs and their position on the ground plane without altering the monopole radiator. To illustrate the CP mechanism and multiband operation of the proposed configuration, the surface current density has been studied. The antenna is fabricated on RT Duroid 5880 substrate of permittivity 2.2 with a total size of 47 × 40 × 1.57 mm3. Compared with the existing antenna designs, the proposed structure is compact and demonstrates improved multiband performance with circular polarization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided EngineeringSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207