MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900077026 · doi:10.22518/20271743.1024

Facultades de la policía judicial en la lucha contra la corrupción en los Estados Unidos

2018· article· es· W2900077026 on OpenAlex
Stephen C. Thaman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de derecho penal · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicViolence, Education, and Gender Studies
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical sciencePleaHumanitiesPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo se ocupa sobre las técnicas de investigación empleadas paraluchar contra la corrupción en los Estados Unidos; por supuesto, tambiénes importante abordar las leyes sustantivas utilizadas por la fiscalía paracumplir esa tarea, las prácticas de resolución consensual de estos conflictosa la luz de las súplicas negociadas (plea bargainig) y el papel que cumple eljurado de conciencia en estos casos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it