Shear behaviour of Canadian marine clay/geomembrane interface under freeze–thaw cycles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of the number of freeze–thaw (F–T) cycles on the interface shear behaviour of a compacted marine clay (Leda clay)/smooth high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane is investigated in this paper. Shear tests are performed on samples subjected to various numbers of F–T cycles: zero, one, two, three, five and ten. The test results show that the interface shear strength of the Leda clay/smooth HDPE geomembrane is lower than that of Leda clay. The interface shear strength of the Leda clay/smooth HDPE geomembrane decreases with increasing number of F–T cycles. Furthermore, the interface shear friction angles of the Leda clay/smooth HDPE geomembrane are significantly reduced within the first three F–T cycles. The reduction in strength beyond the three F–T cycles is negligible. The total decrease in the shear strength of the samples that are not subjected to an F–T cycle compared to that of samples subjected to ten F–T cycles is 18·3, 17·6 and 13·6% under a vertical stress of 150, 250 and 350 kPa, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it