MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900223416 · doi:10.1093/geroni/igy023.2276

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE RISK OF MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION AFTER STROKE OR TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK

2018· article· en· W2900223416 on OpenAlexaff
Richard A. Marottoli, Mark Rapoport, Mark Bayley, Hillel M. Finestone

Bibliographic record

VenueInnovation in Aging · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCINAHLMedicineStroke (engine)Stroke riskPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMEDLINECohort studyPhysical therapyIschemic strokeInternal medicinePsychiatryPsychological interventionIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stroke can impair the motor and cognitive skills required to drive safely. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether stroke and/or transient ischemic attack (TIA) are associated with an increased MVC risk. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO and TRID through December 2016. Results: From the 5,605 citations identified, 12 articles met our inclusion criteria. Only one of three case-control studies showed an increased risk of stroke in persons with at-fault MVC (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0–3.9). Of five cohort reports, only one study, limited to self-report, found an increased risk of MVC associated with stroke or TIA (RR 2.71, 95% CI 1.11–6.61). Discussion: The decline in driving skills following stroke identified in prior reviews does not appear to translate into a robust increase in risk of MVCs. However, there is a paucity of high quality studies of the impact of stroke on driving.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnovation in AgingSame topicOlder Adults Driving StudiesFrench-language works237,207