MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900270753 · doi:10.1002/etep.2766

Adaptive direct power control based on ANN-GWO for grid interactive renewable energy systems with an improved synchronization technique

2018· article· en· W2900270753 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Amine Djema, Mohamed Boudour, Kodjo Agbossou, Alben Cardenas, Mamadou Lamine Doumbia

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchronization (alternating current)Computer scienceIntegratorArtificial neural networkField-programmable gate arrayControl theory (sociology)Multilayer perceptronGridElectronic engineeringEngineeringVoltageArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Embedded systemMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the improvement of synchronization technique for single-phase inverter. Specifically, the paper proposes a modified structure of second-order generalized integrator with frequency-locked loop (SOGI-FLL) with FLL gain normalization. The proposed structure enhances the frequency detection, which makes it a powerful technique under distorted grid voltage. The validation of the proposed synchronization method includes simulations and experimental tests using Xilinx field programmable gate array (FPGA) as the target device. Moreover, time domain simulations using the direct power control (DPC) with the proposed structure are performed. The decoupled active and reactive powers are controlled using the artificial neural networks (ANNs) trained by the mean of a metaheuristic algorithm. In this paper, the grey wolf optimizer (GWO) is proposed to train the multilayer perceptron (MLP). The proposed approach shows better generation of synchronization signals and smooth power quality, making it suitable for grid-tied and microgrids (MGs) power systems control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelinghigh
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Methods
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Simulation or modelingmedium
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical · Methods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Transactions on Electrical Energy SystemsSame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207