MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900311279 · doi:10.1002/jcc.25747

Martini coarse‐grained model for polyethylenimine

2018· article· en· W2900311279 on OpenAlexafffund
Subhamoy Mahajan, Tian Tang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computational Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsWestern Canada Research Grid
KeywordsPolyethylenimineRadius of gyrationDihedral angleBranching (polymer chemistry)ProtonationComputational chemistryChemistryBond lengthSalt bridgeMolecular dynamicsMoleculeChemical physicsPolymerStatistical physicsMaterials sciencePhysicsHydrogen bondOrganic chemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a polycation with diverse applications in biomedical and environmental engineering, polyethylenimine (PEI) can be synthesized with varying degrees of branching, polymerization, and can exist in different protonation states. There have been some interests in molecular modeling of PEI at all-atom or coarse-grained (CG) levels, but present CG models are limited to linear PEIs. Here we present the methodology to systematically categorize bond lengths, bond angles and dihedral angles, which allows us to model branched PEIs. The CG model was developed under the Martini scheme based on eight ~600 Da PEIs, with four different degree of branching at two different protonation states. Comparison of the CG model with all-atom simulations shows good agreement for both local (distributions for bonded interactions) and global (end-to-end distance, radius of gyration) properties, with and without salt. Compatibility of the PEI model with other CG bio-molecules developed under the Martini scheme will allow for large-scale simulations of many PEI-enabled processes. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Computational ChemistrySame topicPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207