MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900318367 · doi:10.34117/bjdv5n12-344

Bola suíça no trabalho de parto: Revisão de literatura

2019· article· pt· W2900318367 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joselinda Sá de Sousa Abreu Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Development · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy-related medical research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSciELOMedicineNursingHumanitiesMEDLINEArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The swiss ball also known birth ball, it is a health instrument used for the relief of pain, relaxation and acceleration of labor. In Brazil it is still little used compared to the United States, Canada, France, England and Belgium, it is performed by health professionals such as nurses and physiotherapists. This article aimed to show and describe the purpose and effects of the birth ball technique in parturients. A review of all the specific literature found on the subject was carried out, being a scarce content. The electronic bases scielo, bireme and Google Academic were consulted from October 2016 to January 2017; As well as primary sources such as books. The material was selected according to the key words: birth ball, physiotherapy, labor; Dating from 1999 to 2016. The results show that the use of the birth ball is an effective resource for alleviating labor pains, contributing to the demedicalization of the parturient, relaxation of the pelvic floor, and a decrease in the active phase of labor. Key-words: Birth ball, Phisiotherapy, Labor A bola suica tambem conhecida como bola do nascimento e um instrumento em saude utilizado para o alivio das dores, relaxamento e aceleracao do trabalho de parto. No Brasil ainda e pouco utilizada em comparacao aos Estados Unidos, Canada, Franca, Inglaterra e Belgica, e executada por profissionais da saude como enfermeiros e fisioterapeutas. Este artigo teve por objetivo mostrar e descrever a finalidade e os efeitos do uso da tecnica bola do nascimento em parturientes. Foi realizada uma revisao de toda literatura especifica encontrada sobre o tema, sendo um conteudo escasso. Foram consultadas as bases eletronicas scielo , bireme e Google Academic no periodo de outubro de 2016 a janeiro de 2017; alem de fontes primarias como livros. O material foi selecionado de acordo com as palavras chaves:  bola do nascimento, Fisioterapia, trabalho de parto; datados de 1999 a 2016. Os resultados mostram que o uso da bola do nascimento e um recurso eficaz para alivio das dores do proprio trabalho de parto contribuindo para a desmedicalizacao da parturiente, relaxamento do assoalho ou diafragma pelvico e diminuicao da fase ativa do trabalho de parto. Palavras Chave : Bola do Nascimento, Fisioterapia, Trabalho de Parto.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0160.021
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of DevelopmentSame topicPregnancy-related medical researchFrench-language works237,207