INTEREST GROUP SESSION - INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND AGING: HEALTH BEHAVIORS AMONG INDIGENOUS OLDER ADULTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indigenous older adults are living longer and remaining involved with families and communities where they derive meaning and a sense of purpose. Indigenous older adults engage in a variety of health behaviors grounded in traditional and western beliefs that enable them to engage in self- care and care for others. This symposium will highlight health behaviors and activities of American Indians and Alaska Natives that provide them with a sense of autonomy and control over their health as well as provide them opportunities to incorporate cultural beliefs and remain engaged, age well, and remain active in life. Our first presentation will present findings from a phenomenological study that examined successful aging among Elders in Northwest Alaska. Our second presentation will discuss Indigenous older adults’ Perspectives on aging well in an urban community in Canada. Our third presentation will share findings on the feasibility and preliminary outcomes from a piloted American Indian Elder Creative Cultural Arts Program. Our fourth presentation will address the needs for palliative care and support among Pacific Islands, and share resources of particular value to peoples underrepresented in palliative care research. Our final presentation will present on the prevalence and correlates of associated comorbidities among Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) aging populations and share results from the NHPI National Health Interview Survey, 2014.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".