Comportamento informacional de crianças e adolescentes: uma revisão da literatura estrangeira
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apresenta revisão de literatura sobre o comportamento informacional de crianças e adolescentes, enfatizando estudos estrangeiros. Introduz com descrição do campo do comportamento informacional humano, de forma mais geral. Destaca principalmente estudos norte-americanos, além de outros da literatura européia, canadense e australiana. As pesquisas analisadas estão reunidas nos seguintes tópicos ou linhas de pesquisa: o aprendizado dos estudantes através da biblioteca escolar; crianças e adolescentes; a Internet e a busca de informação no cotidiano. Os estudos foram selecionados em virtude do intercâmbio entre pesquisadores estrangeiros e a Escola de Ciência da Informação da UFMG e também do estágio doutoral realizado no Centro para Estudos Internacionais em Bibliotecas Escolares, em New Jersey, Estados Unidos. Além da descrição dos estudos, apresenta suas principais conclusões e/ou recomendações. Palavras-chave Crianças – comportamento informacional. Adolescentes – comportamento informacional. Biblioteca escolar – pesquisa. Internet. Modelo ISP – Processo de Busca de Informação. Uso cognitivo da informação. Competência informacional. Informational behavior of children and adolescents: a review of foreign literature Abstract This work presents a review of the literature on the informational behavior of children and adolescents with emphasis on foreign studies, especially from the USA, Europe, Canada and Australia. The works analyzed are grouped in the following topics or research streams: learning through the school library, children and adolescents and the Internet and information use in every-day life. The studies were selected due to the exchange between foreign researchers and the School of Information Studies of UFMG and also to PhD research at the Center for International Scholarship in School Libraries in New Jersey, USA. The description of these studies is followed by a listing of their main conclusions and/or recommendations. Keywords Children – informational behavior. Adolescents – informational behavior. School library – research. Internet. ISP Model – Information Search Process. Cognitive use of the information. Information literacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.017 | 0.028 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".