MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900386064 · doi:10.3139/146.111718

Effect of V and Zr microalloying, and heat treatment on microstructure and mechanical properties of secondary Al-7Si-3Cu-0.3Mg alloy

2018· article· en· W2900386064 on OpenAlexaff
Jovid Rakhmonov, Giulio Timelli, Alberto Fabrizi, Franco Bonollo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceAlloyMicrostructurePrecipitationMetallurgyPrecipitation hardeningSofteningImpurityComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Al–Si–Cu alloys, which are widely used in automotive powertrains, exhibit limited high-temperature strength properties; the high diffusivity of the main strengthening elements Cu and Mg in α-Al at temperatures between 200 and 300 °C is a dominating factor in alloy softening. In this study, effects of slow-diffusing elements (Zr and V) and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of secondary Al-7Si-3Cu-0.3Mg alloy were investigated. Majorities of both Zr and V were retained inside the α-Al matrix during solidification. T6 heat treatment induced the solid-state precipitation of multiple, nano-sized particles in α-Al grain interiors. Unlike Cu/Mg-rich strengthening precipitates that form during aging, the Zr/V-rich precipitates formed during solution heat treatment, which indicates high potential for high-temperature strengthening in Al–Si alloys via transition metal addition. Other transition metals, such as Mn, Fe, Cr and Ti, which were present as impurities in the base alloy significantly promoted the formation of nano-sized Zr/V-rich precipitates inside α-Al grains. These thermally more stable precipitates were credited for the enhanced high-temperature strength properties of Al-7Si-3Cu-0.3Mg alloy by ∼20 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.955

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde)Same topicAluminum Alloy Microstructure PropertiesFrench-language works237,207