MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900390630 · doi:10.7202/1051325ar

Veillée chez Antoinette Bourgeois

2018· article· fr· W2900390630 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Robert B. Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueRabaska Revue d ethnologie de l Amérique française · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtBourgeoisieHumanitiesPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antoinette Bourgeois (1902-1991), fille du photographe franco-américain Ulric Bourgeois (1874-1963) de Manchester au New-Hampshire, et la dernière survivante de sa famille, raconte ses souvenirs en 1978. Elle parle de son père, reconnu pour ses photos du Québec rural et de Manchester. Grâce à celui-ci, elle a pu rencontrer Charlie Lambert, surnommé l’ermite du Mosquito Pond dans les bois près de Manchester, ainsi que le prêtre-écrivain Henri d’Arles, un client de son père. Lorsque la soeur cadette d’Antoinette, Irène Bourgeois, tomba victime de la polio, c’est au frère André qu’elle a eu recours pour sa guérison. Par la suite, Antoinette entra la vie religieuse chez les Soeurs de Sainte Jeanne d’Arc de Sillery, Québec, sous le nom de soeur Céline. Par conséquent, elle a pu connaître des membres du clergé franco-américain du Rhode-Island, partisans d’un côté ou de l’autre du mouvement Sentinelliste. Elle rencontra également Marie-Rose Ferron, surnommée la Petite Rose, stigmatisée de Woonsocket au Rhode-Island. Enfin, après vingt ans de vie religieuse, Antoinette retourna dans sa famille pour s’occuper de ses parents jusqu’à leur décès.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRabaska Revue d ethnologie de l Amérique françaiseSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207