Effect of post weld heat treatment and welding parameters on mechanical and corrosion characteristics of friction stir welded aluminium alloy AA2014-T6
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the effect of post weld heat treatment methods on the mechanical and corrosion characteristics of friction stir welded aluminum alloy AA2014-T6. Aluminum alloy AA2014 is mainly used in applications that demand high strength to weight ratios, such as aerospace, marine, and industrial applications. In this work, AA2014-T6 plates of 6 mm thick were butt welded using a tool with a square profile. Tensile strength, hardness, and corrosion characteristics were compared between the samples as welded and post weld heat treated. Welded samples that were heat treated for a shorter ageing period (8 h) showed improved tensile strength irrespective of welding process parameters, compared to as-welded samples. The samples heat treated for a longer ageing period (9 h) showed a decline in tensile strength for low tool rotation speed. Hardness increased in welded samples heat treated for 8 h. Welded samples heat treated for 9 h show high passivity in corrosion media.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".