MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900413716 · doi:10.5430/rwe.v9n2p12

Testing Profit and Loss Sharing to Stabilise Level of Inflation: Evidence From Indonesia

2018· article· en· W2900413716 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ghozali Maski, An’im Kafabih, Arif Hoetoro

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in World Economy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsProxy (statistics)Inflation (cosmology)Profit sharingReal interest rateEconometricsMonetary economicsProfit (economics)Interest rateStatisticsFinanceMathematicsMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this research is for testing whether profit and loss sharing (PLS) can stabilise inflation compared to interest rate. By using ARDL bound test with monthly data from January 2012 to May 2016, the result shows that PLS that is proxied by national sukuk, mudharabah and musharakah and interest rate simultaneously can affect inflation in Indonesia. Based on coefficient value analysis, PLS that is proxied by national sukuk can stabilise level of inflation in the long run only. Musharakah as other proxy of PLS can stabilise inflation in the short run only. However, mudharabah cannot be used to stabilise inflation both the short run and long run.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.397

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.275
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch in World EconomySame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207