MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900414394 · doi:10.11575/ajer.v64i3.56337

Transitioning from the Reflection-Based Safety Literacy Classroom to the Worksite: The Student Experience

2017· article· en· W2900414394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Calgary · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsNorthern Alberta Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedagogyContext (archaeology)CurriculumSociologyLiteracyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reflection-based safety literacy is a form of education that builds bridges between the classroom and the workplace. This paper explores how experiences shared in the classroom create connections between health and safety learning material and its application in personal and professional lives. The exploration of the student experience showed that students transferred course themes to the work environment more effectively when sharing the experience with a colleague and created personal connection to the content through application and reflection between learning sessions. Instructor and student stories demonstrated that a variety of experiences in implementing and interpreting the material resulted in a meaningful context for the student experience. These themes provide insight into the value of reflection and dialogue as tools to enhance health and safety curriculum. La formation à la sécurité basée sur la réflexion est une forme d’éducation qui érige des ponts entre les salles de classe et les milieux de travail. Cet article explore la mesure dans laquelle le partage d’expériences en classe crée des liens entre le matériel pédagogique portant sur la santé et la sécurité d’une part et son application dans la vie personnelle et professionnelle d’autre part. L’étude de l’expérience des étudiants a révélé que ceux-ci transféraient plus efficacement au milieu de travail les savoirs acquis en classe quand ils partageaient l’expérience avec un collègue et qu’ils créaient des liens personnels avec le contenu par l’application et la réflexion entre les cours. Les récits des enseignants et des étudiants ont démontré que diverses expériences portant sur la mise en pratique et l’interprétation du matériel ont créé un contexte significatif pour l’apprentissage. Ces thèmes offrent un aperçu de la valeur de la réflexion et du dialogue en tant qu’outils pour améliorer le programme d’éducation à la santé et à la sécurité. Mots clés : éducation en matière de santé et sécurité au travail; apprentissage basé sur la réflexion; diversité; narration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.372 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it