MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900461297 · doi:10.15173/jpc.v5i2.3751

Thirty percent off Ontario tuition

2018· article· en· W2900461297 on OpenAlex
Daniel Tisch

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Professional Communication · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Practises and Engagement
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesGovernment of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Government (linguistics)SocializationPublic relationsFace (sociological concept)Political sciencePsychologyMedical educationPedagogySociologyComputer scienceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Argyle Public Relationships team worked with the Ministryof Training, Colleges, and Universities to develop a campaignfor a government program providing tuition rebates topost-secondary students. Argyle used research-based communicationsand evaluated the student environment, identifyingkey issues — including the narrowness of the program scope,difficulty of completing the application, an unidentified targetaudience, and potential controversy — and strategies to addressthem. By focusing on “student-to-student” communications,finding ways to pre-qualify students, and pairing oncampusinteraction with online socialization, the team madeface-to-face contact with 29,000 students on 47 campuses in 21days, resulting in a 27.5% increase of registrations on average.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it