MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900475502 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2018.8517496

Multi Frequency Analysis of Scattering Matrix and Scattering Power Matrix for Marine Vessels Detection

2018· article· en· W2900475502 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gaurav Kumar Dashondhi, Krishna Mohan Buddhiraju

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarMatrix (chemical analysis)Computer scienceClutterSpeckle patternScatteringPoint targetRadar imagingAlgorithmRadarComputer visionObject detectionCo-occurrence matrixArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)OpticsPhysicsTelecommunicationsImage processingImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Independence of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images from weather and sun illumination helps us in maritime surveillance like an oil spill, to identify the illegal fishery activity and unauthorized marine vessels. Detection of marine vessels is like a point target detection in coarse to moderate resolution images. Detection of point targets is adversely affects by speckle noise. Object detection in SAR images, without explicitly reducing the speckle noise is one of the challenging task. In this paper two algorithms are presented, which show how improvement in the power of point target lead us to reduced number of false alarms. The first algorithm has three parts. First part uses Grave matrix, which is a ( 2×2) Hermitian power matrix, generated by the multiplication of Sinclair matrix and conjugate of Sinclair matrix. Second part uses discrimination criteria to discriminate between clutter and vessels based on eigenvalue of the Grave matrix (G). The third part, fill the gaps by using morphological dilation. The only difference between the first and the second algorithms is that, in the second algorithm we uses Sinclair matrix (S2) instead of Grave matrix. Both the algorithms tested on two full-polarization (HH, HV, VH, VV) datasets and the results show the importance of scattering power matrix (G) as compared to scattering matrix (S2) for point target detection. The first data set is of size 498*498 captured by AlOS-1 PALSAR L-band data, covering the coastal region of Singapore. The second data set is of size 472*472, covering the coast of Vancouver acquired in C-band by Radarsat-2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207