MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2900517830 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23404

Feeding strategies of methanol and lipase on eversa® transform‐mediated hydroesterification for FAME production

2018· article· en· W2900517830 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
João H. C. Wancura, Daniela V. Rosset, Gustavo Andrade Ugalde, J. Vladimir Oliveira, Márcio A. Mazutti, Marcus V. Tres, Sérgio Luiz Jahn

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do SulConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsLipaseMethanolBiodieselChemistryYield (engineering)Biodiesel productionCatalysisOrganic chemistryTransesterificationFatty acid methyl esterTriacylglycerol lipaseMolar ratioFood scienceEnzymeMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work reports the influence of different feeding strategies of methanol and catalysts on fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) yield in a beef tallow hydroesterification reaction for biodiesel production catalyzed by liquid lipase. Soluble lipase from the Thermomyces lanuginosus microorganism, named Eversa® Transform, was selected for the reactions in this work. The feeding of methanol and lipase into the system was evaluated varying the methanol to fat molar ratio of 4.0:1 and 4.5:1 and the lipase load of 1.0 wt% and 1.45 wt% in relation to the mass of beef tallow utilized in each assay. The highest yield (85.08 %) of FAME was reached at 35 °C, methanol to fat molar ratio of 4.5:1, 1.0 wt% of lipase, 6.0 wt% of water in only 8 h of reaction, with a one‐step addition of lipase and methanol fed to the process at a constant flow of 3.0 g · h −1 . Moreover, the reutilization process of the liquid lipase after four cycles was evaluated, which is a point rarely addressed in similar works available in the open literature. The findings of this paper demonstrate that the adoption of an appropriate strategy to feed inputs to the system is fundamental in order to take advantage of the maximum catalytic capacity of the lipase and consequently to obtain high yields in the process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationFrench-language works237,207